Creation: The Most Misunderstood Portion of Genesis

11/22/2014 142 Comments

Creation: The Most Misunderstood Portion of Genesis
Human sciences are wanting, wanting as ever. That is because God has reserved some knowledge of his work for him alone.

ECCLESIASTES 8:17
Then I beheld all the work of God, that a man cannot find out the work that is done under the sun: because though a man labor to seek it out, yet he shall not find it; yea further; though a wise man think to know it, yet shall he not be able to find it.

As defined in the dictionary, human science is the study and interpretation of the experiences, activities, constructs, and artefacts associated with human beings. Normally used with the Letter “s,” the human sciences correspond to humanities and social sciences, but also include aspects of psychology and even mathematics.


Discussions by Michael Dunn in The Human Sciences (2013), theoryofknowedge.net said many people do not consider human sciences as true science because they rely on empirical observation to arrive at findings. In contrast, the natural sciences, which are much ‘stricter’ in their use of observation, are backed up by rational theorizing. Still they are just theories. And yet man resorts to either in trying to understand the universe.

Therefore, human sciences as well as natural sciences endeavoring at their best, lack explanation in so many things that actually happen and exist. In faith and in the Bible such unexplained thing is called mystery. This progress report, for example, by Adam Hadhazy published in Popular Mechanics is about unsolved mysteries of science.

Science's 8 Greatest Unsolved Mysteries: Progress Report by Adam Hadhazy
(Ref: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/sciences-greatest-unsolved-mysteries-progress-report#slide-1). The questions include: 1) Will we find a cure for cancer? 2) Can we achieve immortality? 3) Can we create life? 4) Will we find the soul? 5) Are we alone? 6) Is light the ultimate speed limit? 7) Can we travel through time? And 8) Will we find other universes?

To qualify, not everything in the Bible is considered a mystery. The Bible contains information worded in simple words understandable even by the most illiterate of humans. Honor and obey a father and a mother can be understood even by a child.

EPHESIANS 6:1-2
1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.
2 Honor thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise;

To do good to everybody can easily be understood by a person of good conscience.

GALATIANS 6:10
As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.

But how about having light, morning and evening the first day when the sun and the moon were made on the fourth day? Can’t this be possible scientifically speaking? Let us investigate within the pages of the "book" that offers humanity the only credible and real scientific information on how the universe came into existence!

GENESIS 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

In this verse, the only refuted word by unbelievers, especially the atheists, is "God". Real science believes in beginnings. Real science believes that there is an earth, a planet. Real science believes in the expanse that envelopes the earth and other heavenly bodies they call "space" which the Bible calls "heavens".

GENESIS 1:7-8
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

To a person well-versed on the manner of how the Bible was written, the first verse which says "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" is easily understood as the heavens created ahead of the creation of the earth. (The Bible speaks of first things first.) This will give us the implication that the heavens or the universe in its entirety should be older than the earth and this is amazingly scientific! To prove this idea let us read verse 2.

GENESIS 1:2
And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

While verse 1 contains the information that the heavens and the earth were created, we may notice that on verse 2, only the earth was mentioned to be formless and void, meaning that the heavens were already formed at the time that the earth was without form and void. No known and accepted knowledge in science refutes this Biblical truth: that the earth is much younger than the universe that contains it.

Most scientists believe that the universe can be as old as 13 billion years while the earth is 4 to 4.5 billion years old. But why can’t billions of years possibly be the age of the universe when most religious apologists say that the earth is only 6,000 years old?
The most misunderstood portion of the account of creation is that the heavens and the earth were created in six days, and for most of them were literal six 24-hour days, which is wrong!

The counting of the "first day" must be noted to have commenced after the creation of the heavens and the earth when light started to appear.

GENESIS 1:3-5
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

The pronouncement, "Let there be light" does not mean that the existence of light-emitting heavenly bodies like stars and nebulae will only begin at that time. Remember that the heavens was created and formed already in verse 1.

From logic, what is possible is that the process of nuclear fission in stars and other heavenly light-emitting bodies started at the time when God said "Let there be light." This is very much like when the starter of the fluorescent lamp is activated! 

One important thing to consider is (in my mind but not in every mind), that the first day mentioned, is the first day after the creation of the heavens and the earth and not the first day on the planet earth! There are days in heaven which are very much different from days on earth.

DEUTERONOMY 11:21
That your days may be multiplied, and the days of your children, in the land which the LORD swore unto your fathers to give them, as the days of heaven upon the earth.

This explains the fact that only on the fourth day God caused the existence of two great lights to light and to rule upon the earth, (Note that on earth only) because scientifically speaking, our lights - the sun, and the moon –  are very insignificant in relation to the entire universe!

GENESIS 1:14-16
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: the stars also.

To understand the scientificity of the account in Genesis we must take note of the use of the word "made two great lights".

The word bârâ' (baw-raw), create, was used in verse 1, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” while the word ‛âśâh (aw-saw), to make, was used in verse 16, “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: the stars also.”

“To create” is to make something exist while “to make” is to produce something from something that already exists. It is not only logical but scientific to say that "God made two great lights" which biblically and scientifically means that the sun and the moon were already in existence before God caused the sun to emit light and the moon to reflect on earth.

This Sub-topic3 falls under the general topic, “Possibilities and Impossibilities in the Bible.”

More to follow, God willing.

142 comments:

  1. Another Wonderful and Amazing Blog! Thank you Mr.Controversy!!! To God be the Glory!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is truly where the difficulty lies for many of the Bible readers (even atheists who try with a multitude of prejudice as they do so). God being the ultimate author is being disrespected for having His own specific right for the use of His own language and thinking.

    The author of this blog has been for the record made the most sense in the logical explanation of the written text of the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Religious apologists must have falsely relied on this verse for the calculation of 6000 years:

    2 Peter 3:8 KJV

    But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

    They forgot the word "as" synonymous to "like" (appearing in the New American Standards Version), an adverb that denotes comparison and not as exact quantification. Had it been written " a day in the Lord a thousand years, and a thousand years a day it could have been interpreted as such but the verse is an obvious "simile".

    In the art of writing, when a song says " I have loved you for a thousand years"...that doesn't mean literally as no man could actually last a century to love somebody.. it means for a "very long period of time"...




    ReplyDelete
  4. 16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: the stars also.

    >> This is one of the verses being scientifically contested by so-called scientific people. They argue that if it pertains to the sun and the moon, then it would be wrong since the moon does not have its own light but that of being reflected from the sun. Unfortunately, they forget that this Biblical account was written by Moses thousands of years ago for people living thousands of years ago. Not a written presentation to the kind of civilization we have today when modern technology can now take a peek of the far away galaxies much more to the closer objects like the moon.

    When I was a child I used to believe that babies are made out of factories as my parents would tell because a normal 7 year-old could never digest the process of human intercourse and reproduction to the detail.

    The verse is an obvious use of METONYMY. This is what I like about the Bible in the aspect of speech because there is beauty in how the words are being used. There is surely ART in spoken words. Metonymy by definition is a figure of speech in which a thing or concept is called not by its own name but rather by the name of something associated in meaning with the thing or concept.

    If you were to live thousands of years ago, it would have been easier for you to comprehend that the sun and the moon are (by use of metonymy) the two greater lights that rule the earth, the sun being of greater power and the other being of lesser power.

    Mr. Controversy knows the Bible very well...! clap clap

    ReplyDelete
  5. Explaining Creation is a daunting task even by the learned in the Scriptures but only men guided by God can explain the knowledge that He wants His children to understand.
    Thanks be to God for bringing to us Bro. Eli Soriano as our knowledge of God's Word is no longer in parables as our hearts now understand.

    "But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

    For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them."
    - Matthew 13:16 - 17

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amen. Great Blog - please follow - rest assured there are more mysteries to unfold.

      Delete
  6. Only those who have polluted minds cannot accept this facts, excuse me in saying this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is nobody else who can pay much attention into the details of every words used in the Bible like Bro. Eli. As he carefully dig in every word origin of it. Who can differentiate the word "create" and "made" ? Almost everybody who is knowledgable in English... But who can apply it in the Bible to get the precise meaning and details of what was the exact picture of the Genesis? ONLY Bro. Eli ! incredibly, a man who paid a high respect to the Creator of the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mr. Controversy! Thank God you were there... for teaching us to believed,and understand about Gods mystery...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very interesting topic and very informative and I wanted it more...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks be to GOD for this wonderful blog Mr Controversy.
    It is impossible that the creation is only 6 24hour day and the earth is only 6,000 years. It is IMPOSSIBLE.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks be to God for another worth reading article. I had so much fun visiting this page.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I hope the "LIGHT" of this blog will go to the clouded brains of the atheists. Thanks be to God.

    ReplyDelete
  13. :smile
    Faith never fails. God is really good. Thanks be to God.

    ReplyDelete
  14. very interesting read... Thanks be to GOD

    ReplyDelete
  15. I can't wait to read the blog about how Adam and Eve started the human race....because logic suggests they must have had incestuous sexual relations with their children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If one will disregard time element, one might fall to fallacious claim that human race started by incest, which gives malice to Genesis story.

      As the basic maxim says, "There exists no crime and no punishment without a pre-existing penal law appertaining."

      In the beginning, there's no law that prohibits Adam to mate with Eve. Instead, God commanded the first couple to multiply. Only in the time of Moses did God prohibit His people to mate with their relatives. Thus, human race did not start by incest as far as the Bible is concern.

      Delete
  16. awesome!!! while reading the bible you have to consider a lot of things and one of those is science. marvelous!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. wow! worthy to read and reread!
    this kind of blog really feeds our mind and soul,
    Mr.Controversy is truly blessed with knowledge and wisdom from the Creator and he's sharing it to us, thank God for this wonderful person XD

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wow! That's it. Very informative, cant wait to the next blog. Thanks be to God, in Jesus name. It is time for them (atheist) to think once, twice or much better thrice.

    ReplyDelete
  19. A blog coming from a logical and sensible mind. Very interesting. Thanks again Mr. Controversy. God bless you always!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks be to God for teaching Bro. Eli this wisdom that he share to Us.
    To God Be The Glory

    ReplyDelete
  21. Scientifically, God Does Not Exist: Science Allows us to Say God Does Not Exist
    There is No Role for God in Science, No Explanation that God can Provide

    Scientific Proof Against God

    1. Hypothesize a God who plays an important role in the universe.
    2. Assume that God has specific attributes that should provide objective evidence for his existence.
    3. Look for such evidence with an open mind.
    4. If such evidence is found, conclude that God may exist.
    5. If such objective evidence is not found, conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a God with these properties does not exist.


    With the burden of proof on the believer to present a case of the universe in which a god is required, does something or is useful, before the above test can be done.

    Tme and again, this test fails with each new (or old) example offered by the believers, which does not conclude that there may never be a success, but also on the other hand, the constant failures suggest that there is no reasonable, rational or otherwise serious reason to believe a God exists

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Mike,

      Which branch of Science do you know disapproves God's existence that make you think He does not exist?

      Delete
    2. I find it quite amusing to see a commenter (Mike) who stands as the judge, the jury and the prosecutor at the same time just to raise a point that God doesn't exist using science as the basis.

      Well, if one is longing for science as the authority to gauge whether God exists or not, no better renowned scientist can put it better than Albert Einstein. According to Prince Hubertus, Einstein said, "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my LIMITED HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really MAKES ME ANGRY is that they quote me for the support of such views." (Clark, Ronald W. (1971). Einstein: The Life and Times. New York: World Publishing Company, p. 425.)

      (All caps mine.)

      Einstein believed that there is God. He even categorically said, "I am not an atheist." (Viereck, George Sylvester. "Glimpses of the Great". Duckworth, 1930. p. 372-373.)

      He used the term "fanatical atheist" saying, "[T]he fanatical atheists...are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle." (Isaacson, Walter (2007). "Einstein and Faith" Time 169 (April 5): 47.)

      Delete
    3. Hi Mike,

      Allow me to re-post the authors statement :

      Human sciences are wanting, wanting as ever. That is because God has reserved some knowledge of his work for him alone.

      ECCLESIASTES 8:17
      Then I beheld all the work of God, that a man cannot find out the work that is done under the sun: because though a man labor to seek it out, yet he shall not find it; yea further; though a wise man think to know it, yet shall he not be able to find it.

      As defined in the dictionary, human science is the study and interpretation of the experiences, activities, constructs, and artefacts associated with human beings. Normally used with the Letter “s,” the human sciences correspond to humanities and social sciences, but also include aspects of psychology and even mathematics.

      Discussions by Michael Dunn in The Human Sciences (2013), theoryofknowedge.net said many people do not consider human sciences as true science because they rely on empirical observation to arrive at findings. In contrast, the natural sciences, which are much ‘stricter’ in their use of observation, are backed up by rational theorizing. Still they are just theories. And yet man resorts to either in trying to understand the universe.

      Therefore, human sciences as well as natural sciences endeavoring at their best, lack explanation in so many things that actually happen and exist. In faith and in the Bible such unexplained thing is called mystery. This progress report, for example, by Adam Hadhazy published in Popular Mechanics is about unsolved mysteries of science.

      And I say, Read the blog and see if your statement fits. Human science doesn't have the capacity to know how as a computer doesn't have the capacity to know how. Proving something that is already concluded doesn't exist is absurd. Your science may conclude that pluto is a planet and the next thing you know it is otherwise.

      To God be the Glory and all is in Christ name.

      Delete
    4. @Mike,

      You’re commenting here as if you’re trying to prove you are a better scientist than either Albert Einstein (who admitted that the more he study science, the more he believed in God) or Isaac Newton (who acknowledged God as the masterful creator whose existence could not be denied in the face of the grandeur of all creation). However, unlike those great scientists before you, you have the temerity to suggest a “scientific experimentation” about spirituality and religion. At least the other scientists mentioned were aware that scientific experiments are applicable only to matters physical, chemical or biological and not on matters spiritual or supernatural.

      By the way, the atheists' favorite Big Bang Theory to this date is not yet a conclusive scientific principle that could exactly explain the origin of the universe. Can you even tell us where did the singularity that started the Big Bang come from? Isn’t it scientific to say that ENERGY cannot be CREATED or DESTROYED which is actually the First Law of Thermodynamics and therefore, how was there in the first place an ENERGY that caused the Big Bang expansion to occur? Can something comes out of nothing?

      In the absence of scientific experimentation and observation to satisfactorily answer those questions, then you cannot effectively refute the biblical account of creation which people like you misunderstood and refuse to believe.

      Delete
    5. who do you think made the ORDER in the universe? the mathematical accuracy of the distance of the earth from the sun for us not to be toasted.you call it whatever you like i call it GOD almighty

      Delete
    6. First of all, you can not use the Bible as the source of your information about your God, because there is nothing to show that your God exists outside the bible. The Bible is the claim and not the proof of the claim.

      To all those who replied about actual science, ie The Big Bang, etc, I suggest that you personally have no idea what these theories actually predict, what the evidence for their claims are and what data they are based on. All you are doing is copying talking points from other apologists and pasting them here. For me, on a moderated comment section of a blog, to try and educate you in the facts of science, would be an impossible task, because you will not read what I posts, you would not go and research my statements to see if I am correct and you have a predetermined answer for your position.

      Let me prove the above statement with this: "Gravity is thought to be introduced by virtual particles coming into and out of existence. Because of this ongoing action, this is could be a cause for the increasing acceleration of the expansion of the universe."

      Can you show why that statement is correct, incorrect, or meaningless based on science as it is understood today? What your reply to this will show is that you make no effort to answer the question put to you, because you are not interested in the answer, you would rather promote your belief system.

      Fine, lets deal with that instead, I have a question for you about your claim.
      How did your god create the light in Genesis 1.3? What method did he use? What skills or abilities did he call on to make this light? What materials or energies where needed? Can you answer any of these questions, in a manner that equals or betters the answers that, say Lawrence Krause has suggested how the universe came into being?

      Of course you can not, because being theists, you are not interested in the truth of things, as you believe you already have all the truth that you will ever need to know.

      There has never yet been an answer that science has developed for any question, that religion (any) later has come up with an equal or better answer. Not once, ever in the whole history of humanity. And if you do not believe me, name the question and provide the better answer.

      If you can, that is.,

      Delete
    7. Someone who attempts to lawyer atheism such as Mike but falls short in practicing justice and common sense, coupled with condescending tone will most likely fail to establish his case nor win souls.

      Justice and common sense dictate that whoever accuses should prove his allegation. Mr. Controversy's blog contains lots of points that prove God exists; backed up by the very words of God himself as written in His letter - the Bible. Whoever alleges that God doesn't exist must in other way present counter-arguments to establish his case - hence, the burden of proof should lie on the challenger, not on the one being challenged. Sadly until now, Mike keeps on accusing and accusing and accusing yet evade the responsibility to prove his accusation and chooses to turn the table again and again and again for his comfort.

      Also, Mike prohibiting theists to use the Bible is already a sign of desperate measure to lead readers in his own subjection. Good luck for his pointless crusade.

      Delete
    8. @Mike, you said:

      “Let me prove the above statement with this: "Gravity is thought to be introduced by virtual particles coming into and out of existence. Because of this ongoing action, this is could be a cause for the increasing acceleration of the expansion of the universe."

      Can you show why that statement is correct, incorrect, or meaningless based on science as it is understood today? What your reply to this will show is that you make no effort to answer the question put to you, because you are not interested in the answer, you would rather promote your belief system.

      Fine, lets deal with that instead, I have a question for you about your claim.
      How did your god create the light in Genesis 1.3? What method did he use? What skills or abilities did he call on to make this light? What materials or energies where needed? Can you answer any of these questions, in a manner that equals or betters the answers that, say Lawrence Krause has suggested how the universe came into being?”


      My reply:

      A statement that begins with “Gravity is thought… or could be...” is a presumptuous and uncertain proposition devoid of solid basis, otherwise, it should have been definitive. There are still technical knowledge that science has to know more about Gravity particularly about universal gravitation.

      Suffice it to know at this point that science defines gravity as a force of attraction that exists between any two masses, any two bodies, any two particles. Gravity is not just the attraction between objects and the Earth. It is an attraction that exists between all objects, everywhere in the universe. Sir Isaac Newton (1642 -- 1727) discovered that a force is required to change the speed or direction of movement of an object. He also realized that the force called "gravity" must make an apple fall from a tree, or humans and animals live on the surface of our spinning planet without being flung off.

      Furthermore, Newton deduced that gravity forces exist between all objects and the effect of gravity extends from each object out into space in all directions, and for an infinite distance. However, the strength of the gravitational force reduces quickly with distance. Humans are never aware of the Sun's gravity pulling them, because the pull is so small at the distance between the Earth and Sun. Yet, it is the Sun's gravity that keeps the Earth in its orbit! Neither are we aware of the pull of lunar gravity on our bodies, but the Moon's gravity is responsible for the ocean tides on Earth.
      Reference: http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question30.html

      If you could understand the above statement from the cited reference, then logic and common sense should enjoin you to realize the precise distance the heavenly bodies are situated in relation to each other. The heavenly bodies are perfectly measured (in terms of mass, weight and element composition) and so located at the given perfect distance relative to each other to ensure continuity of motion and existence. Otherwise, universal collision of heavenly bodies will be the consequence if they are wrongly placed and wrongly composed in terms of mass, weight and element.

      The perfect design of the universe that keeps it going amazes scientists like Newton and Einstein to acknowledge the unseen Hand behind this wonderful creation, and He is GOD! Mike, I hope you would not insist that this amazing Wonder of the Universe is a mere product of ACCIDENT, it makes no sense!

      Delete
    9. Do you have prove that your god actually authored the Bible? I am talking about extra-biblical evidence that can be tested. Do you accept for example that the patriarchs, from Noah to Moses actually are real humans in the history of the Middle East, and can you offer evidence of their existence and deeds from outside the alleged Jewish mythology? Were is the evidence of these people in say the Egyptian records, or the Greek or Indian writings, or any of the lesser groups closer to these events? There are none. Allow me to give you an example. How many people were alleged to have left from Egypt at the start of the Exodus, I have heard claims of up to half a million people. And yet we have no record of such movement of such a large number of people from that period of time. In fact, over 50 years of examination of the area that the Exodus was supposed to have covered has found no evidence of such a large group of people and their chattel moving across it. And this examination was doing by the Antiquities Museum of Jerusalem on the orders of the first President of Israel. The words he used was "Go and find the Title deeds to Israel." They did not and even now the Jews acknowledge this.

      What this means is that the stories in the Pentateuch have no basis in reality or history, they are all made up from similar stories of that time and place. Which means that to use the bible to prove itself is a logical fallacy and makes the claims of the religion invalid. That is why you are not allowed to use the bible in support of your claims.


      This lack strongly suggests that all these stories are created by later men for purposes of their design.

      Delete
    10. Atheists have nowhere to go but to realize the authenticity of the BIBLE and to come face to face with the TRUTH...

      The Special People that are the Jews
      https://esoriano.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/the-special-people-that-are-the-jews/

      In the early 19th Century a papyrus, dating from the end of the Middle Kingdom, was found in Egypt. It was taken to the Leiden Museum in Holland and interpreted by A.H. Gardiner in 1909. The complete papyrus can be found in the book Admonitions of an Egyptian from a heiratic papyrus in Leiden. The papyrus describes violent upheavals in Egypt, starvation, drought, escape of slaves (with the wealth of the Egyptians), and death throughout the land. The papyrus was written by an Egyptian named Ipuwer and appears to be an eyewitness account of the effects of the Exodus plagues from the perspective of an average Egyptian. http://ohr.edu/yhiy/article.php/838

      More evidences on the BIBLE'S authenticity for your information.

      1. Proof of the Parting of the Red Sea and the Chariots/Egyptians that Drowned
      https://evidenceoftruth.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/proof-of-the-parting-of-the-red-sea-and-the-chariotsegyptians-that-drowned/

      2. Biblical Archaeology: Evidence of the Exodus from Egypt
      http://www.bibleandscience.com/archaeology/exodus.htm

      Delete
    11. Mike pointed out that the Exodus never occured due to, according to him, absence of evidence proving it. But this is just the logical fallacy of argument to ignorance!

      It might appear that there are no physical evidence to describe the Exodus IF you will only rely on popular press. One example is “the lack of evidence” of the Hebrews’ wanderings through the desert.

      First, we should remember that Hebrews during that time, were nomadic people who seldom, if ever, leave any trace of their presence (which was wise for anyone being pursued in a life and death situation). They never planted crops nor built cities. Even their clothings did not wear out. Not included here yet was the enormous power and influence of Egyptian empire to cover up and clean the mess and disgrace left to them by the escaping Hebrews. A powerful and egotistic empire will not, at their cost, record in history that they were defeated by their slaves; and their gods by the God of Hebrews.

      However, the events before and after the Exodus are testable and datable. Unfortunately, extremely strong evidence supporting Exodus’ validity never made it to the popular press but has been published only in the scientific journals. These studies examined one of the Egyptian plagues (before the Exodus) and the demise of Jericho (after the Exodus). For more details, you can check the original article here: http://bit.ly/1w1ThIE. To sum it up, events surrounding the Exodus are testable and datable.

      We can see that Mike’s main problem, like any other atheists, is his constant alienation with God and things beyond natural, beyond science. Besides, how can you measure a supernatural being by using “natural laws”? If miracles are always strained by laws of nature, how can those be recognized as extraordinary if they only appear on a regular basis? Besides, don’t forget that we’re in a blog titled “Controversy Extraordinary” so not all can be grasped by ordinary thinking, much more for idiots!

      Anyway, mo matter how convincing the evidence is, even as the size of the universe, if one shut his heart to justify immorailty, he will only strive hard to keep that status for deviltry. Very predictable.

      Delete
  22. Thanks be to God for this! Only the most sensible man of our time can explain all of this with the Help of The Holy Spirit. To God be the Glory!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Only if you can empty your cup, then you will come to understand the blogs of Mr. Controversy.
    God will fill your empty cup (heart) with knowledge, faith, hope, love, holiness and happiness.

    ReplyDelete
  24. wisdom is overflowing in this blog.. Mr Controversy is really blessed to have received this very deep knowledge and ofcourse we are so blessed he shared it to us. I learned alot from this. very clear and very biblical.

    ReplyDelete
  25. You are totally misled, mr.mike with the kind of science that you know. God is in every reaction in chemistry, the forces and dynamics in physics, the measurements and exactness in mathematics and geometry and many more... when man desired to fly, did he not base his design on flying creatures? When he wanted to move fast over waters, did he not watch and studied the swimming creatures?When modern men launched their communication satellites, did they not studied the orbiting planets? These involved engineering science. Do you not consider it agriculture science to watch a bee pollinating a flower of cucumber and after a few weeks give you the nourishment of a well loved vegetable? If that is not science to you, you are a hopeless creature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Odin the Father God is good to the people of the earth. He provides for all of us.

      And if you are that much of a theist and unable to understand/recognise sarcasm, then let me explain. Your claim of your God being the one responsible for everything is the exact same as my one about Odin being responsible for everything.

      If you make the claim that a god was involved in "assisting" humans doing stuff, then for your claim to be accepted, you will have to show that gods can exist, that they do exist and that they actually take an interest in human affairs. And these answers must be able to be tested to confirm their truth. Faith can not be used to support the claims made.

      You do understand what faith is not allowed in these types of questions, right?

      Delete
    2. Following Mike's line of thinking, we can say Mike doesn't exist and his comments just popped out from nothing. If so, he should provide proof that he is and not a random ape who learned to type behind a keyboard.

      Delete
    3. This Mike is also have stinky mouth.He doesn't know what he is talking about.He only formulating presumptions,but have lack of evidences.

      Delete
    4. Leo, you so cute with your ad hominem, "stinky mouth" grin.

      The only reason you attack me this way, is because you can not refute my statements. I understand why, it is because you are a theist who is not allowed to think about anything other than what has been indoctrinated into you.

      I challenge to take one statement that I have made here and show why and how that statement is wrong.

      Delete
    5. Leo, with all due respect, no ad hominems please. I want to observe this discussion.

      Delete
  26. This is the reason why we need Mr. Controversy to let us understand how creation written in Genesis is an exact science and not a fairy tale as understand by non-believers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Science:
      0 sec Big Bang,
      10^-34 sec quarks,
      10^-10 electrons,
      2 min positrons,
      300 000 years protons neutrons and hydrogen helium atoms,
      10 million years: protogalaxies,
      100 million: first stars,
      1 billion: early supernovas, water
      1.7 billion furthest observed water
      9.2 billion: our sun
      9.3 billion: earth
      9.35 billion: another small planet collapsed into earth, the remains created the moon
      9.7 billion: oceans and rivers
      10 billion: first cells found
      11.6 bil: complex cells
      12.6 bil: multicellular life
      13 bil: simple animals
      13.1 bil: fish
      13.2 bil: land plants
      13.25 bil: amphibians
      13.3 bil: reptiles
      13.4 bil: mammals
      13.45 bil: birds
      13.78: humans
      13.79: now

      Bible/Torah/Quran genesis:
      day 1: water, earth, light, day/night
      Day 2: firmament
      Day 3: oceans, plants,
      Day 4: stars, sun, moon
      Day 5: fish, birds
      Day 6: land animals, Adam
      1838 years: Abraham
      2089 years: Joseph
      2478: Moses
      3992: Jesus
      6017: Now

      Science Order: stars, light, water, sun, earth, earth days/night, moon, rain, rivers, animals, fish, plants, land animals, birds, human

      Abrahamic religion order:
      water, earth, light, day/night, oceans, rivers, plants, stars, sun, moon, fish, birds, land animals, human, rain

      Before you talk to me about God please go and prove all those sciences they are wrong, otherwise

      Delete
    2. Do you know that The Big Bang is still a theory? And that scientific theories, according to LiveScience.org can be rejected just like hypotheses?

      Before anyone talks about science, check the difference between law and theory first.

      To avoid making strawman argument, check Mr. Controversy’s explanation about the alleged 24-hour days of Genesis creation here: http://bit.ly/1FFJnvm.

      Delete
    3. So, one second before the big bang = what?

      Delete
  27. Man always find a reason they never listen and.understand , specially the atheist if they only observes everything on they sorrounding.they gonna find out that there is no arguement about the creation consider the blackhole out in the vast universe do they know where it leads? Whose wise among men on earth can answer it. Even science admits that all their mathematical, and physics collaps there. They cannot find an answer that even light could not escape on it. There is no arguement if God said let there be light somewhere in the vast universe a light came out, I believe if the sky are blue because of layer of gases so the universe also that are full of dust,and lots of gases have they consider a simple haevy rain cloud can block the sunlight, one day God will fold the darkness of the universe and we will see him. I believe as the blue sky has its edge so also the darkness of the universe has its edge where God Dwells where the light that no man can come close to it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Edison, I can just replace the word God that you used in the above comment with lets say a hyper intelligent shade of the colour blue and it would have the exact same amount of validity in it's claim.

      I could claim that the colour blue is the creator of everything, and just claim this on faith alone, as you have done with your claim of your God doing everything.

      Delete
    2. mr mike your calculation of years is wrong...how could you count 24 day period of 1st to 7th day when the sun created on the fourth day?...means to the day that said there is not earth days...open your mind buddy....

      Delete
    3. mr. mike?...your calculation is a big wrong bigger than your mouth...how could you calculate years of creation in the book of genesis when the said day is not 24 hour day? the sun just like what you've post is created in the 4rth day?...means to say that day that said in the book of genesis from 1st to 7th day is not earth days composed of 24 hour...from sunset to sunset...open your mind buddy...

      Delete
  28. Science proves the authenticity of the Bible thus the existence of God. Thanks be to God. To God be the glory. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cite sources for your claim. Do you even know how to do that. To show that the Bible is the result of the authorship of the Christian god, can you do that?

      So far, no one has managed to do that. Give it a try here, I dare you.

      Delete
  29. Bruce Hood, professor of developmental psychology at Bristol University, suggest that magical and supernatural beliefs are HARDWIRED INTO THE BRAINS and that religions are therefore tapping into a powerful psychological force. ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211511/Why-born-believe-God-Its-wired-brain-says-psychologist.html#ixzz3K8zhhV5i )

    Therefore, if that is the case, those unbelievers/atheists are considered BRAINLESS. Nothing in them can be HARDWIRED into (the belief in God particularly)!

    ReplyDelete
  30. He (God) will not leave us at zero knowledge about His presence.

    ***
    God spot' is found in brain
    by Steve Connor

    Science Correspondent

    LA Times, Wednesday 29 October 1997


    SCIENTISTS believe they have discovered a "God module" in the brain which could be responsible for man's evolutionary instinct to believe in religion.

    A study of epileptics who are known to have profoundly spiritual experiences has located a circuit of nerves in the front of the brain which appears to become electrically active when they think about God.

    The scientists said that although the research and its conclusions are preliminary, initial results suggest that the phenomenon of religious belief is "hard-wired" into the brain.

    Epileptic patients who suffer from seizures of the brain's frontal lobe said they frequently experience intense mystical episodes and often become obsessed with religious spirituality.

    A team of neuroscientists from the University of California at San Diego said the most intriguing explanation is that the seizure causes an overstimulation of the nerves in a part of the brain dubbed the "God module".

    "There may be dedicated neural machinery in the temporal lobes concerned with religion. This may have evolved to impose order and stability on society," the team reported at a conference last week.

    The results indicate that whether a person believes in a religion or even in God may depend on how enhanced is this part of the brain's electrical circuitry, the scientists said.

    Dr Vilayanur Ramachandran, head of the research team, said the study involved comparing epileptic patients with normal people and a group who said they were intensely religious.

    Electrical monitors on their skin ­ a standard test for activity in the brain's temporal lobes ­ showed that the epileptics and the deeply religious displayed a similar response when shown words invoking spiritual belief.

    Evolutionary scientists have suggested that belief in God, which is a common trait found in human societies around the world and throughout history, may be built into the brain's complex electrical circuitry as a Darwinian adaptation to encourage co-operation between individuals.

    If the research is correct and a "God module" exists, then it might suggest that individuals who are atheists could have a differently configured neural circuit.

    A spokesman for Richard Harries, the Bishop of Oxford, said whether there is a "God module" is a question for scientists, not theologians. "It would not be surprising if God had created us with a physical facility for belief," he said.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Thank you God for this Mr. Controversy blog #harthartthisblog

    ReplyDelete
  32. To Mr. Mike we have only one source the bible and no one can deny the truthness written on it before that the science claim that the world is round the bible say so. Everything said in our book is facts. And not hearsay, our book can stand alone! How about yours? Your appearance evolved as time goes by how about your thinking does it evolve? Do you act as a strange one? This my Question to you..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your book is facts? Lets check.

      Matthew
      "The star ... went before them."
      If the star "went before them," leading them to Bethlehem, then it couldn't have been a star or any other astronomical object or event. But Matthew couldn't have known that. Everyone at the time thought that stars were just little points of light a short distance above the earth. It'd be no problem to have one hover above a particular place for a while. 2:9

      The devil kidnaps Jesus and takes him up to the top of the temple, and then to the top of "an exceedingly high mountain," high enough to see "all the kingdoms of the world." I guess the earth was flat in those days. 4:8

      Jesus is incorrect when he says that the mustard seed is the smallest seed. And since there are no trees in the mustard family, mustard seeds do not grow into "the greatest of all trees." 13:31-32

      When Jesus was crucified, there was three hours of complete darkness "over all the land." And when he died, there was a great earthquake with many corpses walking the streets of Jerusalem. It is strange that there is no record of any of these extraordinary events outside of the gospels. 27:45, 51-53

      Your Bible is filled with errors, because it was written by primitive humans who had no idea about the events in their lives.

      To show my statement is true, just take a verse from the bible, one of the magic ones, and then honestly try and find a natural reason for that event. You will find it very easy to do. I suggest you use the "first miracle" at Canaan for this.

      How easy would it be to come during the night and replace the water with wine? Every modern stage magician does this trick.

      Delete
  33. Wonderful Blog! Very Informative...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Again another blow by blow facts present to us by Mr. Controversy

    ReplyDelete
  35. Another Amusing blog. Informative to God be the glory.

    ReplyDelete
  36. ATHEIST VS. BLIND RELIGIOUS LEADER = Easy battle for atheist

    ATHEIST VS. MR. CONTROVERSY = Impossible for atheist to win!

    Thanks be to GOD!!! for sending Extraordinary Mr. Controversy!

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think mr. Mike do not carefully understand what he is reading his mind was totally blotted, trying to justified himself no wonder the bible said one like him " they been blinded their because of their evilness so that they never know the truth, how pity it is, his mind never evolved because if its evolving he will not post anymore in here..he himself never believe in involution His mouth accepting it but his mind denying what he believes...

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hey Mikey kid,

    You’re never different from the kiddoh Jeremy (typical atheist). Your vessel is full of sand and stones that cannot accommodate the water pouring out in this blog. Gaining knowledge is never confined to what you currently know but to empty your cup kid so that you could learn. I’m not saying you’re wrong but the bible confirms your predicaments to be embarrassing and false. First of all how you misunderstood bible accounts are very, very embarrassing and laughable. I don’t blame you for that if that is your perspective in life. Mainly depends on who and how you were brought up and the environment around you. I have a God and I believe and know that there is. Can we prove God to exist outside the bible? So means to say that you want us to prove God without the bible. Can you prove that God doesn’t exist without your basis? See I’m asking for justice. The reason why you don’t believe in God is because someone influenced you not to. And the reason why I believe in God is because someone influenced me that there is a God and the one who told me that there is a God is a credible witness. Credibility is an issue on how you believe in a belief. Who told you that you are the son of your mom, without the birth certificate? Is that someone a credible witness who says you’re the son of your mom? If you go back and back until you reach your mother lucy the chimp, but I apologize lucy doesn’t speak I believe no way she could have transferred the information that human somehow started with her. I believe she is not credible. But I did go back and back until I came up with Adam and Eve and as far as I know they know how to speak for God created them to speak. They are not like cave man who knows huba huba as a language or maybe an amoeba that still an amoeba and forgot how to evolve. Our witnesses know how to speak and they are the one who said that they came from God and everything was from God. See Mikey kid if we are to be logical I see your laughable belief is a predicament of a person who thinks he knows more because of what he knows right now may change depending on the resources available. Mine is as it was, that before human discover earth to be round it was already round.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I was amazed on Mr. Controversy's clarification of Genesis 1:16 with regards to the making of the sun, moon and the stars. I was, therefore, wrong for thinking that God created the sun and the moon on the fourth day. They were already there even before the fourth day, and on the fourth day, he "made" the already existing objects into great lights (lighting up the sun will, as a consequence, light up the moon). The sequence of creation is now more scientifically convincing.

    ReplyDelete
  40. attn.. MIKE

    When Jesus was crucified, there was three hours of complete darkness "over all the land." And when he died, there was a great earthquake with many corpses walking the streets of Jerusalem. It is strange that there is no record of any of these extraordinary events outside of the gospels. 27:45, 51-53

    pls. read Heb 11:35-38 Women received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection:And others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and imprisonment They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented; (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.

    nice try MIKE, you have to read more!!! =)


    ReplyDelete
  41. Very wonderful to know that the days sited in the book of Genesis ia not the day here on earth. I’m just wondering, why the only refuted word by unbelievers, especially the atheists, is "God". But they believe in His creations? I think, they should read all the blogs of Mr. Controversy for them able to understand things. Have a great day!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Human science as well as natural science try hard to do or achieve something. I believe that the bible is the only credible and real scientific information on how the universe came into existence.
    The Bible itself is an exact science! So why do some people try hard and do their very best to oppose on what the Bible says which is TRUE!
    Atheist hold a wide range of their beliefs and philosophy and they come to their own standards which is a big lie!,independently of the Creator and of those who believe in God. To all the atheist,"Who do you think created the stars for your big bang theory?,Who do you think created you and came into existence in this world?",the only capable to do that is our Creator,it is God.May I just remind you that your "Big Bang Theory" is just a THEORY,no proofs and no exact evidences which state that this is true.
    This is an amazing blog! I have learned so much from this because me in myself got confused in the portion of the creation of Genesis. Thanks be to God Mr. Controversy for enlightened my mind and to make clear this most misunderstood portion of the Genesis. I have encountered many intelligent people who tried to explain this but only Mr. Controversy made it right!

    ReplyDelete
  43. thanks be to God for this wonderful blog mr. controversy
    i hope everyone should read this
    science is not a science without the help of bible. for the bible is the proof and evidence that we,people are created by our God .their theories on creation is such a fool , they have no strong evidence on that so why can you encourage us to believe on the fake idea you have??
    all i can say is bible is the most informative and true book that prove that GOD IS REALLY EXIST

    ReplyDelete
  44. There are many things that scientist can`t explain and prove that only Bible can do! “The Bible contains information worded in simple words understandable even by the most illiterate of humans. ”Hope that more and more scientist believed in God and His creation like others do.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Another article that enlightened my mind. I am really enjoying reading and visiting this site. Worth reading and very informative articles that open those heart and mind that is closed. Thanks be to God!

    ReplyDelete
  46. The creation is not six 24 hours, I agree to you Mr.Controversy."There are days in heaven which are very much different from days on earth." Very interesting and informative article. Thanks be to GOD, More power Mr.Controversy!!!

    ReplyDelete
  47. This is a very informative blog. It just only says that Science has always an Biblical Explanation which means we should not only rely on Scientific explanation. Atheist do not believe in God because there mind are already close on the scientific thinking not knowing that it has other explanation which we can get from the Bible itself. We should not underestimate The Bible because for most Book of all Time, Bible is the most accurate and reliable source of Creation and everything.

    ReplyDelete
  48. This is a very informative blog. It just only explains that Science has always an Biblical explanation which means we should not only rely on the Scientific explanation. Atheist do not believe in God because their mind are already closed in their thinking not looking that it has an Biblical explanation. The Bible is the most accurate and reliable source of book in all time. We can find the explanation of the Creation and everything in the Bible that's why, we should based our principles of life on It and not in the other things.

    ReplyDelete
  49. In the bible there are things that is very difficult to understand. there are things also that is very understandable, like what Mr. Controversy said even if the child can understand it. but there is nothing difficult to understand if you will accept it whole-heartedly.

    ReplyDelete
  50. While I was reading I realize how keen Mr. Controversy is, like the way he explained the Genesis 1:1-2. He really notice the unnoticeable. Thanks be to God Mr. Controversy for writing this blog for us to understand some uncommon things written in Bible that we cannot easily understand. It's an eye opener for the real meaning of the account of creation.

    ReplyDelete
  51. There are things in this world even science can't explain. I strongly believe that there's one God who creates all of the things in the world . There are things in this world that man cannot do there are really one God who can create this world. Read the Bible it explains everything about the creation .


    days of creation is not exactly 24 hours . day is 24 hours its because of somd scientific reason of thebrotation of the earth but the days that have said in the bible about yhe creation is not exactly 24 hours . Thanks be to God for knowledge . Reading this blog will never waste of time

    ReplyDelete
  52. Due to the comments and response regarding this Blog, I can say that most of all is a follower of true Christian nowadays. We believed that all the scriptures written in the bible is definitely accurate and reliable.

    Atheist pertaining that God is not really exist! How people exist without God?
    It means that people existed without creator? Like what they said about big bang theory it is upon nothing!

    According to this site All about Science

    That Big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe. The big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened during and after that moment.

    Prior to that moment there is a beginning :)

    I am enjoying reading this article, more wisdom :)
    Thank God Mr. Controversy for this eye opener for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I am already reading the Bible when I was on my early age. When I first read the accounts of creation in Genesis, to be honest, I am doubtful if the Bible is true. While I am reading it, I do have the kind of thinking that the 'day' the Bible was referring is a 24-hour day period. But I am not an atheist. I strongly believe in God. Back then, I cannot comprehend how possible it is that the existence of man is just a day prior to the creation of animals, fishes and fowls. But now, I am enlightened. Thanks be to God for this informative article!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Wow!!! It is really cool and amazing. I can't express the feeling that I was able to read a detailed explanation of the Creation portion of the Bible. I have not known any who ca explain it exact as it is. Thanks be to God for this opportunity to read this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Thanks be to GOD for having Mr. Controversy.

    ReplyDelete
  56. An amazing article! This article doesn't only clear some beliefs in science but it also clear our mind about what we believe is true about creation. The Bible is the main book of all books because all fields of different subjects were in there. Mathematics, Science, Logic, etc. Just name it! The Bible doesn't only feed our souls but it also feed our minds about the basic matter that humans must know. Congratulations Mr. Controversy for this mind-boggling information.God bless!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Not everything we learned from childhood is true! Not everything we learned from science class is factual and reliable. That is why there are theories. And theories aren't proven yet! And these are man-made. And men are prone to mistakes! Especially when they don't believe in God!

    ReplyDelete
  58. To God be the Glory !
    I'm agree and it is right to say that God has reserved some knowledge of his work for him alone.There are some words written in the bible that was really hard to understand but not everything in the bible considered mystery.There are some information in the bible that is easy to understand that even those who is illiterate can get it.I agree with all of this, that I don't really understand some words in the bible, but despite of this,I believe that there is existing God that creates everything.

    ReplyDelete
  59. To God be the Glory !
    I'm agree and it is right to say that God has reserved some knowledge of his work for him alone.There are some words written in the bible that was really hard to understand but not everything in the bible considered mystery.There are some information in the bible that is easy to understand that even those who is illiterate can get it.I agree with all of this, that I don't really understand some words in the bible, but despite of this,I believe that there is existing God that creates everything.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Not all we learned from our teachers when we are in grade school about the creation of the earth is true because it has an accurate Biblical explation in everything that was here in the world specially the creation of he earth which Bro.Eliseo Soriano prove in his explanation in this blog.We must not rely and depend on what people says we need to believe to the people who have a accurate basis in their explanations.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Not all we learned from our teachers when we are in grade school about the creation of the earth is true because it has an accurate Biblical explation in everything that was here in the world specially the creation of he earth which Bro.Eliseo Soriano prove in his explanation in this blog.We must not rely and depend on what people says we need to believe to the people who have a accurate basis in their explanations.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I think that's what life is.Some people only believe on what they want to believe but they don't understand is that not all things can explain by science, and true. I do not say that science is not true but we must rely and believe on what the Bible says not on what the man made, because in the first place, there's a lot of things that can be only explain by the Bible. I guess that's all. Thanks be to God. and Mr. Controversy.

    ReplyDelete
  63. A Great explaination from Mr.Controversy! now I know that there are days in heaven which are very much different from days on earth and to know that some discoveries of many scientist today is already written in the Bible. Thanks Be To God !!

    ReplyDelete
  64. very informative and educational blog! It will help us to enlighten our minds and be careful in choosing words.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Human's science is great and we make use of them everyday.. But human itself is limited in what he can thinks and do. Since there is God who is much powerful and not limited like human, His science is more reliable than human science, even though some of it doesn't sync with their science, God's natural science is still the best.

    ReplyDelete
  66. thanks be to God! for another great explanation and information i learned. it helps me to understand some portions of the bible. I was so blessed for knowing wisdom of God, i realize that bible can explain everything that science has.

    ReplyDelete
  67. to God be the Glory! very well explained! thanks for the information.

    ReplyDelete
  68. It is indeed true that the bible has the answer to everything!
    Thanks be to God:) I learn a lot of things from this blog.Some of questions in my mind are also answered, This is really an informative blog:)))

    ReplyDelete
  69. It is right that we human cannot know or find God's work. Because were only human that made by God.

    Thanks be to God!

    ReplyDelete
  70. Surprisingly detailed explanation! I’m so lucky to know that there are some meanings and understandings like this hidden in the Bible which needed a deeper analysis which was perfectly explained by the most sensible preacher of our time-Bro Eli Soriano. Thanks be to God that He has entrusted His words to you for sharing and teaching to open our minds and understand the true meanings in the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Thanks be to God For this Blog !
    Many minds were opened :)
    I hope all atheists will believe that bible was true and will convice them to believe to God :)

    ReplyDelete
  72. The Bible really has the answer to everything, just can't see the sense why some people are trying really hard to oppose the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  73. It is true that the bible has the answer to everything.
    thanks for this blog . I learned many things

    ReplyDelete
  74. Our physical structure simply tells us that there is a great God behind this creation. It is a perfect design than no one can't deny. There's a possibility of existing of the unseen. According to 2 Corinthians 4:18 - "So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." Thanks be to God.. Thanks Mr. Controversy for sharing this wisdom to us. TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

    ReplyDelete
  75. i am late reading your blog i found it interesting and informative.... thank very much.

    ReplyDelete
  76. thank very much informative and interesting to read.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Another blog that enlighten my mind. very informative.thanks be to God.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Thanks God for a very wonderful information that I have read ,there's a very informative information that I have know today,I hope many readers read this article to enlighten their mind.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Thank's God for this kind of Blog

    ReplyDelete
  80. Thank's God for this kind of Blog

    ReplyDelete
  81. Close minded people won't really understand this kind of article! They were blinded by the false statement that their religions taught them.

    Thanks be to God and to Our Lord Jesus Christ for being an open minded and willing to learn a lot of teachings that are coming from the Bible!

    ReplyDelete
  82. worthy to read..thanks be to God

    ReplyDelete
  83. Very informative blog, presentation of biblical accounts and scientific findings and facts are well established and presented. Thanks be to God for another nice blog truly an eye opener.

    ReplyDelete
  84. very very well explained according to the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  85. A good read to enlighten you day. Thanks be to God!

    ReplyDelete
  86. Great read to enlighten your day. Thanks be unto God!

    ReplyDelete
  87. Very well explained..a must-read, specially for people who rely on science more than on the Bible. Thanks be unto God!

    ReplyDelete
  88. A lot of people especially those who are reading the Bible is misunderstood Genesis creation of mankind. The calculation is wrong because the fact the book of Genesis is not easy to understand. Thanks to Mr. ControversyX for this very well explanation ..
    To God be the glory !!!

    ReplyDelete
  89. Thanks GOD for His unspeakable gifts

    ReplyDelete
  90. Thanks be to God for this wonderful blog To God be the Glory!

    ReplyDelete
  91. Tnx be to God mr contreversy God bless

    ReplyDelete
  92. Very informative and educational blog read it and be open minded

    ReplyDelete
  93. Another one of a kind, article from Mr.controversyx.Biblically and scientifically true! Thanks be to God!

    ReplyDelete
  94. I had read: How did your god create the light in Genesis 1.3? What method did he use? What skills or abilities did he call on to make this light? What materials or energies where needed? Can you answer any of these questions.

    And God said Let there be light.

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. - John 1:1

    What else he need to be God?

    Thanks be to God.

    ReplyDelete
  95. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.

    it seems that your ideas are all based on personal opinions, observations or in short fallacies.
    cancer can be cured now. cannabis are already on its way.....

    can you prove god exists?
    in your idea how old is the universe and the planets including earth?
    who created the bible?

    ReplyDelete
  96. The day in earth is different in the day of jupiter or saturn or pluto, so the day in a planet positioning in the edge of the galaxy is much more far beyond the day of the earth. So if God is in the edge or out of this universe, i therefore conclude that the 1 day of God is already a millions or billions of years of earth.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Hey mr. Devonn do you believe in the books of history? Do you believe in the book about hitler? If you believe on those books, why? Have you ever seen hitler or any other famous people on those history books? I could say that they may not also even exist. For i haven't seen them nor tested them but we cannot deny the fact that they're true right? So how can you say that the bible is not true?

    ReplyDelete
  98. God's words are powerful!Thanks be to God because of this blog, the misconceptions about the Creation by most religions are now cleared up!
    Hebrews 4:12 - "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart."

    ReplyDelete
  99. Scientifically and Biblically true! i hope everyone should read this. Thanks be to God for this Blog.

    TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

    ReplyDelete