The Confused Aborticidal Richard Dawkins vs. the Vindictive God of Creation
An atheist biologist wrote that the God of the Bible is "a vindictive character," one of his uncalled for accusations against someone who he believes does not exist, and "arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction!" He wrote this in his book, The God Delusion (Amazon: 2006). Moreover, he went on to sell aborticide or feticide as moral in Twitter and he would not apologize for doing so.
Let
us learn biblical wisdom by analyzing what kind of a person or
character in reality
- not fiction –
Richard
Dawkins
is! It
is time we check if he is credible in what he says – especially as
regards life as in snuffing it out with or without authority. That is
the issue.
God,
to maintain order
among
His people, at
that time the Israelites,
said:
DEUTERONOMY 32:35-36
35 To
me belongeth vengeance,
and recompense; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of
their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them
make haste.
36 For the LORD shall
judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth
that their power is gone, and there is none shut up, or left.
If
everyone living is given the freedom to avenge any offender, whether
the offense is real or perceived, we will be seeing a society of
humans with animalistic behaviors! The right to judge, to avenge, and
vindicate belongs to the power that sustains human society.
JAMES 4:12
There
is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy:
who
art thou that judgest another?
Without
doubt
God is just (to his creation), but His
judgments will surely be unwanted
because they are meant to be exemplary – as warning or deterrent.
PSALMS
7:11 (RSV)
God
is a righteous judge,
and a God who has indignation every day.
He
judges
beyond what any judge can
see!
ISAIAH 11:3
And
shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the LORD: and he
shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after
the hearing of his ears:
He
knows the depth of the human entity –
the nook and cranny of man’s heart.
JEREMIAH 17:9-10
9 The
heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who
can know it?
10 I
the LORD search the heart,
I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and
according to the fruit of his doings.
And
in judgment He uses mercy where and when it is called for.
JAMES 2:13
For
he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath showed no mercy;
and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
PSALMS 62:12
Also
unto thee, O
Lord, belongeth mercy:
for
thou renderest to every man according to his work.
To
vindicate
the offended helpless victims of injustice or
give relief to those He is “growing” as a nation, God is
vindictive against unpardonable evil, and
after
many warnings, that
is the
best justice that can be served.
With
the incorrigible
rooted out, the playing field is leveled.
REVELATION 6:9-11
9 And when he had
opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that
were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they
held:
10 And
they cried with a loud voice, saying, How
long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood
on them that dwell on the earth?
11 And
white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto
them, that
they should rest yet for a little season,
until their fellow servants also and their brethren, that should be
killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
In
the real sense of the word, Dawkins, although a popular
scientist, did not use a scientific
mind in
judging that God is vindictive! God waited for four hundred long
years for the Canaanites to repent,
for
four hundred long years for the Egyptians to learn mercy, and for
four hundred long years for the Israelites to learn to trust their
God. And yet before executing His judgment upon them, God
showed
supernatural wonders to convert them to obey and be spared!
His
simple demand for the Egyptians was
to
"free My people and be spared of His wrath." They have had
enough cruelty against His chosen people for four hundred years. On
the other hand, to
the Canaanites, the wonders he
performed
to liberate his
people,
Israel, were known to them to give them a last chance to
change
before
He would pronounce
their total annihilation! But
they did not!
JOSHUA 2:9-14
9 And she said unto
the men, I know that the LORD hath given you the land, and that your
terror is fallen upon us, and that all the inhabitants of the land
faint because of you.
10 For we have heard
how the LORD dried up the water of the Red sea for you, when ye came
out of Egypt; and what ye did unto the two kings of the Amorites,
that were on the other side Jordan, Sihon and Og, whom ye utterly
destroyed.
11 And as soon as we
had heard these things, our hearts did melt, neither did there remain
any more courage in any man because of you: for the LORD your God, he
is God in heaven above, and in earth beneath.
12 Now therefore, I
pray you, swear unto me by the LORD, since I have showed you
kindness, that ye will also show kindness unto my father's house, and
give me a true token:
13 And that ye will
save alive my father, and my mother, and my brethren, and my sisters,
and all that they have, and deliver our lives from death.
14 And the men
answered her, Our life for yours, if ye utter not this our business.
And it shall be, when the LORD hath given us the land, that we will
deal kindly and truly with thee.
The
Canaanites
were
a wayward nation of idolaters and sexually-pervert maniacs, cruel -
in
the truest sense of it -
butchering their own children and offering them to Baal!
Ben
Hobrink, author
of “Modern Science in the Bible: Amazing Scientific Truths found in
Ancient Texts” (Amazon: 2011)
was quoting authorities aside from a Professor Merrill Unger
(1909-1980), a biblical archaeologist.
Merrill
mentioned sacred prostitution, child sacrifice and snake worship
among the Canaanites. This was corroborated by other sources.
Meanwhile,
excerpts
from
the discovery of Ugaritic texts written by Jack Burch “Jeremiah,
Prophet of God,” (http://www.pfce.us/documents/Jeremiah.pdf) told
about an ancient tombstone accidentally uncovered on a peasant’s
farm at Ugarit in 1928. Ugarit is now part of the country of Syria.
In 1929 the area was
excavated by a team of French archaeologists led by Claude F.A.
Schaeffer. The original excavations uncovered a house and its
library. The building appears to have housed a scribe’s school and
hundreds of clay tablet were discovered in the library. These tablets
provided archaeologists with excellent information concerning the
worship of the Canaanite and Phoenician gods and goddesses, including
the bizarre sexual practices of the pagan fertility cults including
Baal and Dagon. The building turned out to be the house of the chief
priest.
The oldest of these
tablets date back to about 1400 B.C. This is about one hundred fifty
years before Israel’s exodus from Egypt. A number of religious
articles such as small figurines of Baal were also discovered.
Additional excavations were conducted in 1948 when the royal palace
was discovered, yielding important historical texts. Excavations
continued, the latest having been conducted by French archaeologists
in the year 2000.
But
as I earlier mentioned, child sacrifice appeared to be the apogee
of the extent of immorality among Canaanites.
In
sum, instead of a bloodthirsty self-absorbed non-being that Dawkins
sees, the God of the Old Testament who gave orders to his people to
get rid of immoral Canaanites is actually a resolute manager
practicing hands-on directorial rights to his creation. Failing to
come up to standards, these people who practiced free sex, child
sacrifice, spread of venereal diseases, barbarous and licentious
cultic practice did not merit remedial or repair strategies to
continue existing but total extermination. Given notice to make
changes through the international publication of God’s work against
the mighty Egyptians, the Canaanites preferred to believe there was
no one in charge.
The
Canaanite culture of moral corruption reflected a refusal to learn,
which to the Manager God was an indication of instability. Their
history did not merit managerial considerations of continued land
grant, management, and growth in order to succeed. Their riddance
then was a coping measure that the Manager God put into action. Since
he is creator, he knew best which measures to use according to the
enormity of these people’s sins.
Considering
all these things, it is but
just
in all its reality, for God
the creator,
to pronounce the annihilation of these people. But
for Dawkins, a mere human being, to pronounce the death of all
fetuses with Down syndrome is most certainly absurd. Shedding of
innocent blood is abomination in the sight of the Lord.
PROVERBS 6:16-19
16
These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an
abomination unto him:
17 A
proud look, a lying tongue, and
hands that
shed
innocent blood,
18 A heart that
deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to
mischief,
19 A false witness
that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
The
Bible is clear about shedding innocent blood. But notice what this
atheist said, as written by a reporter from BBC News Ouch, dated
August 21, 2014. It appears that Dawkins was advising a young woman
in Twitter who posed a hypothetical situation when her baby might be
born with Down syndrome. What would she do?
As
defined in the dictionary, Down
syndrome (or Down's
syndrome)
is a chromosomal disorder
caused
by an error in cell division that results in an extra 21st
chromosome. The condition leads to impairments in both cognitive
ability and physical growth that range from mild to moderate
developmental disabilities (MedicalNewsToday, Sept 26, 2014). Here
are excerpts from the report of Kathleen
Hawkins
(http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-ouch-28879659
). It was titled, “Richard
Dawkins: 'Immoral' not to abort Down’s foetuses.”
Richard Dawkins, the
atheist writer, has caused a stir on Twitter claiming it is "immoral"
to allow unborn babies with Down's syndrome to live.
The Oxford professor
posted the message on Twitter in response to a user who wrote she
would be faced with "a real ethical dilemma" if she became
pregnant and learned that the baby would be born with Down's
syndrome.
"Abort it and try
again," Dawkins tweeted in reply. "It would be immoral to
bring it into the world if you have the choice."
His comments have caused
anger online and have been dismissed by charities, but he insists his
views are "very civilised", tweeting: "These are
fetuses, diagnosed before they have human feelings."
Dawkins defended his
comments on the social media website saying: "I do not for one
moment apologise for approaching moral philosophic questions in a
logical way. There's a place for emotion & this isn't it."
But in a subsequent blog
post outlining what he meant by his tweets, Dawkins writes that he
supports those philosophers who say that an adult, a child and a baby
should all be granted the rights of a person. "An early fetus,
before it develops a nervous system, should not," he concludes.
The
report said, Anthony Ozimic, communications manager of the Society
for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) took exception to
Dawkins's comments because they raise the argument about when human
life begins. He said all unborn children, whether disabled or not,
have right to life with the rest of humanity.
If
Dawkins and his fans club, the atheists, will rule the world, there
would
be
three important and comforting words that will vanish from
the
dictionary: love, mercy, and compassion! That
woman in Twitter woefully was not asking a question from the
life-giver, but from someone with lack of humanity and emotional
disconnect with the living.
What
is the truth about Down syndrome? Should the fetus be aborted as
advised by Richard Dawkins? Gynecology and obstetrics define
feticide or aborticide as “the destruction of a fetus in the uterus.”
If
not aborted, will these beings become useful or employable at all?
The
National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS) Organization
(http://www.ndss.org/)
that is doing its best to increase public awareness and acceptance of
people with DS, belies or qualifies the many myths circulating
around. These myths include: that DS is a rare disorder; people
afflicted with it have short life span; it is hereditary and runs in
families; the children are born to older parents; patients have
severe cognitive delays; they have to be institutionalized; as
children, they must be segregated; they are not employable; and that
DS can never be cured. Brief excerpts from the literature of the
organization, however, say -
Research
on Down syndrome is making great strides in identifying the genes on
chromosome 21 that cause the characteristics of Down syndrome.
Scientists now feel strongly that it will be possible to improve,
correct or prevent many of the problems associated with DS in the
future....
Businesses
are seeking adults with Down syndrome for a variety of positions.
They are being employed in small- and medium-sized offices: by banks,
corporations, nursing homes, hotels and restaurants. They work in the
music and entertainment industry, in clerical positions, childcare,
the sports field and in the computer industry to name a few.
The
mission of the NDSS is said to be the national advocate for the
value, acceptance and inclusion of people with Down syndrome. In
other words, not everyone has the mind of Richard Dawkins, who by all
means is countering the efforts of communities sympathetic to this
handicap. Records show that most parents are capable of loving these
people that could lead useful lives if allowed to survive.
As
these are also God’s children, surely
this Dawkins is an instrument of Satan, an
aborticist,
a feticist, a
murderer,
a Satanist.
JOHN 8:44
Ye are
of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer
from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no
truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he
is a liar, and the father of it.
Dawkin’s
Confusion
While
this evolutionary
biologist would
condone the child sacrifices of the Canaanites by calling God
vindictive, this hypocrite would propose aborting the children of a
people yet unjudged. He would justify himself saying these DS fetuses
have no nervous system yet and there is no point being emotional
about it. But it does not appear that feticide or aborticide is
anyone’s prerogative, much less one of an atheist.
If
God is vindictive in carrying out judgments over immoral nations,
even if it meant the elimination of a generation, it is part of his
pruning processes as a developer/manager/owner over all his creation.
But for an insignificant creature to suggest the demise of another
creature, there doesn’t appear any logical authority for such
licentious suggestion.
By
and large, immorality was the reason the creator “pruned out” bad
eggs from the face of the earth. But there was never a suggestion
that it is moral if one expelled one’s fetus because there was a
chromosomal error. If allowed to live, these children can grow up to
honor a God that can be vindictive when there is a wrong to
eliminate. But Dawkins cannot tell which is right and which is wrong
– being godless.
Why
can’t Dawkins make distinctions between an immoral Canaanite nation
and the innocent disabled fetuses? Obviously, there is a heavy price
to pay. Over the years, Dawkins had been making money taunting the
one who gave his life – and he still is. Now, he would be preaching
how other’s lives would be snuffed out too.
Richard
Dawkins is churning out dead works as he is a living dead.
This
is Part 8 of Possibility and Impossibility in the Bible.
More
to follow.
144 Comments: