The God of the Bible: Forcing out the Genocidal, Infanticidal, and Filicidal

We come to the other charges of an evolutionary biologist against the God of the Bible that He is genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal. 

These shocking definitions come from Richard Dawkins who, until lately, is known as the most famous atheist. In recent debates with some clergy, Dawkins has described himself as an agnostic and “cannot disprove the existence of God,” prompting the religious to call on atheists to look for another leader. Dawkins, after all, is not a militant secularist although he would like the world to believe he is one. For all his mudslinging at the God of the Bible, he admittedly “cannot disprove the existence of God.” 

Nevertheless, in coming up with a book where has earned a fortune and still is, Dawkins called God, among other descriptions, “genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal.” 

 Genocide is defined in the dictionary as murder of an entire ethnic group: the systematic killing of all the people from a national, ethnic, or religious group, or an attempt to do this. 

Infanticide is defined as the act of killing infants or a newborn baby. 

And filicide means killing of one’s own child. 

The -al variations, of course, are adjectives. If God were genocidal, infanticidal, filicidal, that means he is capable of doing all these, has done them, is doing them, or tends to do them – along the terms that Dawkins understands. 

But all these charges of Dawkins against the God of the Bible redounds to him bull's eye! In writing for Daily Mail of UK (, George Pitcher on December 16, 2011, exposed the mind of Dawkins who asked another atheist, Christopher Hitchens, 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?' 

Titled “Professor Richard Dawkins makes a festive vow to 'destroy Christianity,'” Pitcher wrote -

Hitchens is thoughtful about CS Lewis and Christianity and rather leaves Prof. Dawkins floundering in his wake, occasionally interjecting little assents to show that he's still there, as he struggles to keep up.

But one of these interjections is most revealing. About half-way through, the Prof gets this in edgeways: 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?'

For background, very few of the major atheists have come into the open, declaring that their purpose is to destroy Christianity. Their intent is usually limited to simple criticism, open dialogue. But here comes Dawkins. 

In an interview with Christopher Hitchens, Dawkins queries the late atheist whether he has considered a scenario wherein they win and destroy Christianity. Should that happen, would the vacuum be filled by Islam? 

Dawkins denied later on that he said this but George Pitcher stands pat on what he wrote. The reporter of Daily Mail said Hitchens was an atheist while he lived but did not have “destroy Christianity” as an agenda. 

So, Dawkin’s unfulfilled plan to destroy all Christianity is definitely genocidal! If the God of the Bible were genocidal, no atheist would be alive today! 

As part of the comments on George Pitcher’s article, a reader from United Kingdom said the speech of Dawkins should be monitored closely. Imagine having a dream of destroying Christianity, calling religion as virus, and impressing that teaching children about God is child abuse. 

This kind of speech should be monitored closely. To "destroy" people, to label religious views as a "virus" and to bring children up in Christianity as "child abuse" are all things he has said. This kind of talk would not be out of place in Nazi Germany. We have to be very careful.

King David, after experiencing cruelty and bitterness from his enemies with whom he had done no wrong, prayed that God may destroy them all. 

PSALMS 109:4-5, 13 
4 For my love they are my adversaries: but I give myself unto prayer. 
5 And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love. 
13 Let his posterity be cut off; and in the generation following let their name be blotted out.

PSALMS 83:17
Let them be confounded and troubled forever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:

Although David was a favored man of God, God did not hearken unto him! Why? Because He is not genocidal. 

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

God ordering the annihilation of the Canaanites was not being genocidal. The order was an execution of judgment against a people or a nation of infanticides and filicides! This is about a race needing to be blotted out because of what they did to their children (child sacrifice, free sex, child prostitution, and the like). Their culture did not merit being preserved. 

29 When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land; 
30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. 
31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.

How can a God that abhors infanticide, Himself be infanticidal and filicidal? In truth, it is Dawkins who is infanticidal and certainly filicidal when he advised someone in twitter asking a hypothetical question to abort her child! 

God would never agree to hurt an unborn fetus! Unlike Dawkins who arrogates to himself some authority as to who should live and who should die, here is what the God of the Bible says - 

EXODUS 21:22-24 
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, 
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

By God's law Richard Dawkins merits death for being genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal! 

Forgetting Richard Dawkins, let us discover from the Bible the gentleness and the loving kindness of the God of the Bible. 

God takes care of a baby from conception to adulthood until death. 

Before a baby is born, the mammary glands of the mother works in preparing all the necessary ingredients of life and the defenses for the baby's well-being. The breast of a feeding mother is nature-tuned for her to remember that her baby must be fed at the right moment. 

An authority on breastfeeding, Kelly Bonyata, wrote on August 31, 2011 ( - 

During pregnancy and the first few days postpartum, milk supply is hormonally driven – this is called the endocrine control system. Essentially, as long as the proper hormones are in place, mom will start making colostrum about halfway through pregnancy (Lactogenesis I) and her milk will increase in volume (Lactogenesis II) around 30-40 hours after birth.

According to her, earlier researchers observed that milk volume is typically greater in the morning hours and falls gradually as the day progresses. Quoting Hurgoiu (1985), she wrote that fat content tends to increase as the day progresses. These observations are consistent with current research where babies were found to normally have longer sleep at night and gradually decreases the amount of time between nursing as the day progresses. 

ISAIAH 49:15 
Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.

God is protecting each growing child by his injunctions to parents to care for their children. He placed those paternal instincts in their consciousness. 

 If any one does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his own family, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

These laws are not only protective measures but penalties go with those uncaring and disobeying parents! 

But the fearful, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

An uncaring parent is worse than an infidel or unbeliever, and infidels are destined to the lake of fire. At the age of puberty, a virgin is placed under the protection of the father. 

Nevertheless he that standeth steadfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.

How can the God of the Bible that cares for a human being from conception until adulthood be infanticidal, filicidal, and genocidal? 

 Back to Dawkins, surely, he doesn't deserve to be a professor! He is a MONSTER!!! 

Arguably, Dawkins is the most repulsive character around - not in fiction - but in the physical, spiritual, and mental reality!


Why God is not a Racist

1/24/2015 , 51 Comments

The God whose existence Richard Dawkins and atheists deny is the God of the Bible.  Dawkin’s accusation against this God is based on his misunderstanding of the scriptures! He charged the Biblical God of being "homophobic" because this Biblical God does not approve of the perverted sexual desire and practices of homosexuals.

Homophobia is irrational fear or aversion to or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals. God, being the creator, is also the creator of homosexuals and has no reason to fear or discriminate against what he created. As explained in earlier posts, it is what homosexuals can do (activating their orientation) that is abominable to God.

For one to charge another as homophobic carries the inherent implication that one is a supporter, an adherent, a partisan, an advocator, a backer, a proponent, an exponent of licentiousness that some homosexuals engage in. It is safe to say Dawkins agrees with abominable and dangerous sexual perversion that science says is quite unsafe. The Bible warns -

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. 

Dawkins was indeed selective with whom to bushwhack while there are within the sphere of human religiosity, many "gods"!

Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.

This crusading idol of atheists did not attack nor charge Buddha, the god of the Buddhists. He did not attack rats, the gods of some Indians, simply because rats can be seen and are hardly god to him. These rats mate with their mother or father, and they could be the ancestors of Evolutionist Dawkins and his peers.

One of the most disgusting and stupid accusations of Dawkins against the God of the Bible is that He is a racist. A racist would believe that a particular race is superior to another.

The Biblical God as we have discussed in an earlier blog is a God who does not practice favoritism or "is not a respecter of persons."

THE ACTS 10:34-35
34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

How can a God, who is not a respecter of persons, be a respecter of race or a racist? Even before humanity came to the point of being divided into different races, God showed Abraham His loving kindness to all races that would be.

I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee, and IN THEE shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.

How can a God, who is willing to bless all kindreds of earth, be racist? This pronouncement of God to Abraham came with a promise even before there were races.

Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children.

What the God of the Bible wants to do is to bless races as He blessed Abraham. If there be any curse that befalls a race or a nation it is not God's desire but a measure of justice to wayward nations like those in Canaan at the time of the exodus! This necessary and fair act of the God of the Bible to maintain world order can hardly be understood by atheists and the likes of Richard Dawkins.

ISAIAH 60:12
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.

There is only one point in the Bible wherein God can be considered racist! This is where He loves the human race more than the angels. By that, He becomes racist – in the true sense - but again as with a managerial God, He has order. Among the human race however, the playing field is level: they who do not form or conform into his image lose their right to be a race worth preserving.

For surely it is not with angels that he is concerned but with the descendants of Abraham.

God loves humans more than anything in His creation!

6 But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man, that thou visitest him?
7 Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honor, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:


The Bible calls the Israelites as "God's chosen people.” Chosen, why and for what? Certainly not because God is racist!  The Israelites were chosen for them to be the forefathers of the "seed.” Notice that seed is singular, and it refers to Christ.

Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

The chosen "seed" coming from the race of Abraham will be the savior of all other races on earth!

For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

As flashback, Israelites were said to be God’s people. There was the intention of God to make them be, but as history reveals, Israel failed with all their idolatry and sinfulness. The iniquities of the Israelites reached the pinnacle of His patience and leniency that He took from them His kingdom and promised to establish it among the very people whom the Israelites hated most – the Gentiles. This emphasizes that God is not a racist, but a God of justice, founded on reasons and equity.

Remember that Israel was most favored by God at that time they were commanded to drive away the wayward Canaanites. Next, it was their turn to be deprived of blessings because of their hard-heartedness. This is a prophecy being fulfilled for the end times – and that is today – whether you believe it or not.

Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.

For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the LORD of hosts.

I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought me not: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by my name.

A racist would disregard justice. God, however, practices justice which practice reverberates deep within the heart of an intelligent being like a human made from the likeness and image of his Creator GOD! But certainly not in humans who are descendants of beasts like Darwin.

Let us consider these scientific findings.

Nature works within the human race. Naturally nature works with a common pattern for humans. Humans with short stature bear offspring of short stature too. But nature has extra-curricular activities!

A dwarf is a short-statured person whose adult height is 4 feet 10 inches or under. Dwarfism can be caused by any one of more than 300 conditions, most of which are genetic and present at birth (

Disturbed by a variety of factors in the environment, the work of nature can be unnatural. A misbehaving immune system maybe the cause of autoimmune diseases.

An autoimmune disorder occurs when the body’s immune system attacks and destroys healthy body tissue by mistake. 

..When you have an autoimmune disorder, your immune system does not distinguish between healthy tissue and antigens. As a result, the body sets off a reaction that destroys normal tissues.

The exact cause of autoimmune disorders is unknown. One theory is that some microorganisms (such as bacteria or viruses) or drugs may trigger changes that confuse the immune system. This may happen more often in people who have genes that make them more prone to autoimmune disorders. (

What is wonderful to know is that God's pronouncement or words in the Bible can over-power the workings of nature!

God prohibits man's unnecessary intervention in nature, like crossbreeding.

Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle engender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woolen come upon thee.

We can understand that this statute intends to conserve and preserve each particular species of animals and plants. Studies show that crossbreeding produce undesirable results, like genetically modified organisms, thus, proving again the scientificity of God's pronouncements in the Bible.

Big Cat Rescue is an organization that makes a pitch against crossbreeding animals. It asks a critical question and answers it: “Where do Ligers come from? Irresponsible breeders is the short answer.” Here is its more detailed explanation -

A liger is the result of breeding a male lion to a tigress. A tigon is the result of breeding a male tiger to a lioness. Since lions and tigers do not exist in the same areas, this is not something that happens in the wild. It is done in captivity by disreputable carnies to produce a freak that ignorant people will pay to see. These cats suffer from many birth defects and usually die young. Because ligers are usually larger than either parent, it also puts the tigress at great risk in carrying the young and may require C-section deliveries or kill her in the process. When the public quits paying to see these unfortunate creatures, the evil people responsible for breeding them will stop this inhumane practice.

In the campaign of, it warns the public of the evil motives behind this crossbreeding. It says –

…Anyone who cares about animals knows that this is a despicable thing to do because the cats have to spend their lives in deprivation and confinement and are genetically so unhealthy that they usually die young. The only reason anyone breeds ligers is to create a freak that simple-minded people will pay to see.

This organization that is bent on conserving lions and tigers in their natural state posted a story written by Maryann Mott dated August 5, 2005. The title is, “Ligers Make a ‘Dynamite’ Leap Into the Limelight.” The obvious motive however is to justify the need to crossbreed, hence the novel products - ligers and tigons. According to, this story “attempts to make it sound like there could be some reason to breed lions and tigers for public amusement.”

Ligers and Tigons
It’s half lion, half tiger, and completely real. Now thanks to a cameo in the 2004 cult movie Napoleon Dynamite, the liger has leaped into the limelight, prompting fans to ask, what are they really like?

The faintly striped, shaggy-maned creatures are the offspring of male lions and female tigers, which gives them the ability to both roar like lions and chuff like tigers - a supposedly affectionate sound that falls somewhere between a purr and a raspberry.

Weighing in at about a thousand pounds (450 kilograms) each, they typically devour 50 pounds (23 kilograms) of raw meat in a meal.

“For the most part they’re really laid back,” said Jason Hutcherson, vice president of Wild Animal Safari in Pine Mountain , Georgia. “They like to swim and play in the water.”

The drive-through wildlife park is believed to have the country’s largest concentration of ligers, housing ten of the massive cats.

Since 1999 the park has bred its male lion and female tiger many times, producing about 24 cubs.

Not all of them have been healthy, though. We’ve had 3 out of 24 that, for all practical purposes, were normal but developed as they grew older some kind of neurological disorder,” Hutcherson said.

Autopsies didn’t reveal what caused the cubs to develop “head shakes,” so park staff “chalked it up to a genetic defect,” Hutcherson said.

Accredited zoos frown on the practice of mixing two different species and have never bred ligers, says Jane Ballentine, a spokesperson for the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, based in Silver Spring , Maryland. “Keeping the two species separate has always been standard procedure,” she said.

The story went on and on and one gets the feeling that the author is trying its best to be balanced, mentioning what health authorities said about these new breeds, but at the same time was gushing over such creatures of interest.

Back to (heterosexual) mating, one thing is certain, God never prohibited the mating of a black to a white race, or to a red race, or to a yellow race, for Him to be a racist. The example of Moses marrying an Ethiopian woman clearly did not elicit disapproval from God.

NUMBERS 12:1-8
1 And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.
2 And they said, Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken also by us? And the LORD heard it.
3 (Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.)
4 And the LORD spoke suddenly unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto Miriam, Come out ye three unto the tabernacle of the congregation. And they three came out.
5 And the LORD came down in the pillar of the cloud, and stood in the door of the tabernacle, and called Aaron and Miriam: and they both came forth.
6 And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.
7 My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.
8 With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?

God approved of Moses marrying an Ethiopian or a black woman. He who created mankind is not a racist. In sum, it is still God who gives the standard of what is right and what is wrong with his creation – not just anyone especially Dawkins who dares to measure God although believing that he had descended from animals.

More to follow.


Dangers of Oral and Anal Sex that God Warned About

1/17/2015 , 188 Comments

Homophobia is defined as unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality. In turn, a homosexual is a person who is sexually attracted to people of his own sex. Therefore, if God is homophobic, he fears homosexuals or is antipathetic toward homosexuals. That is as far as Richard Dawkins, the author, sees God.

Is God homophobic?

To begin with, Dawkins proposes to be a militant atheist, but he quibbles between believing in the existence of God or not at all. In an interview with The Telegraph, February 24, 2012, he said -

I can't be sure God does not exist... On a scale of seven, where one means I know he exists, and seven I know he doesn't, I call myself a six... That doesn't mean I'm absolutely confident, that I absolutely know, because I don't.

Two years later, in an article written for The Telegraph dated 24 May 2014 by Science Correspondent
Sarah Knapton, Dawkins was quoted as saying -

I would describe myself as a secular Christian in the same sense as secular Jews have a feeling for nostalgia and ceremonies… I am a secular Christian, if you want to call me that.

Dawkins is therefore not an atheist in the true sense but at best, an agnostic, albeit a licentious one. By definition, he is one who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena. In effect, he doesn’t claim faith or disbelief in God. Being that, Dawkins took the liberty of maliciously piling adjectives about God in his book, The God Delusion.

There is no logic in the accusation of Dawkins that God is homophobic for the reason that God is not a respecter of persons. Here’s what the Bible says -

For there is no respect of persons with God.

It is not because you are a real man or a real woman that you are counted "special" in His sight. Why? Because He created all men.

And the LORD said unto him, Who hath made man's mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?

THE ACTS 17:26
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

Thine, O LORD, is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all.

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

What Dawkins does not understand is, that man is part of God's creation whether he is straight or homosexual. How can a God who created all men and is not a respecter of persons be homophobic? Since He doesn’t practice favoritism in His creation, how can He be homophobic? In fact, God wants all men to be saved.

Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

The most loving and compassionate Creator is offering everyone including homosexuals salvation.

THE ACTS 10:34-35
34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

God accepts everyone that doeth righteousness. He is not partial to homos. There is the distinction that what is sinful is homosexual behavior but not same-sex orientation. If one has an orientation toward something, he doesn’t have to translate that orientation into activity. That orientation is not sinful, but the activity is.

It is the act of unrighteousness that God dislikes among homosexuals and every other man! Any sinful act is offensive to God. But if homosexuals refrain from unrighteousness, they can be sanctified to merit salvation.

9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,
10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Accusing God who sanctifies homosexuals to be homophobic is most certainly unfair! It is just as irresponsible as the tweets of Richard Dawkins on ranking rape and pedophilia as mild and violent – as if they were something to be condoned if “mild” only. Dawkins excuses himself that he doesn’t endorse either, so for what purpose is the ranking?

Surprise of surprises, Dawkin’s prurient interests manifest in his representing homos. He who affords himself the oxymoron of being “secular Christian” is one with a very loose tongue. What does research say about homosexuality and what happens when orientation translates into activity? Isn’t Dawkins endorsing them by way of calling God homophobic?

Now let us look deeper into the rationale that God set on His holy book hated by unbelievers.

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

What are the scientific considerations that authenticate the scientificity of this biblical injunction? The possibilities of a man lying with another man or a woman with another woman is through anal and oral sex.

On its website, the National Health Service (NHS) of England ( discusses the health risks of anal sex as one of common health questions. Accordingly, anal sex is any type of sexual activity that involves the anal area (bottom). This includes: (1) Penetrating the anus with a penis, (2) Penetrating the anus with fingers or sex toys, such as vibrators, (3) Oral sex (stimulating the anus using the mouth or tongue, also known as rimming). It explains that anal sex can spread STIs and why -

What are the main risks of anal sex?
Penetrative anal sex has a higher risk of spreading STIs than many other types of sexual activity. This is because the lining of the anus is thin and can easily be damaged, which makes it more vulnerable to infection.

Further, NHS said STIs that can be passed on through anal sex include: (1) Chlamydia, (2) Genital herpes, (3) Genital warts, (4) Gonorrhea, (5) Hepatitis B, (6) HIV, and (7) Syphilis. Some infections caused by bacteria or viruses can be passed on through oral–anal sex, such as hepatitis A or E. coli. It's also possible to pass on an STI by inserting a finger into someone’s anus.

Another organization ( called AVERT also cautions people about the dangers of oral sex or oral stimulation of the genitals. An international HIV and AIDS charity, based in the UK, it is working to avert HIV and AIDS worldwide, through education, treatment and care. It mentions the same risks that NHS wrote but goes more detailed. On oral sex, it says -

(1) The most common STD transmitted via oral sex is herpes. There are two main types of herpes simplex virus (HSV): HSV type 1, which usually causes cold sores around the mouth, and HSV type 2, which generally causes sores around the genitals. If a person has HSV type 1 and they give oral sex to another person, the herpes could be transmitted to the genital area of the other person, causing genital sores. This process can also work in reverse, with HSV-2 transmitting from the genitals to the mouth of the other person during oral sex, though this is rare.

(2) Gonorrhea can easily be transmitted via oral sex. The infection is usually passed from infected genitals to a person's throat, but can also be passed from an infected throat to a person's genitals. The body will almost always naturally clear the throat of the bacteria that cause gonorrhea within three months, although infections in the genital tract will usually require antibiotics to cure.

(3) Syphilis is easily transmitted during oral sex if a person’s mouth comes into contact with an open sore or a skin rash caused by the infection.

(4) It is possible (but thought to be not very common) for the human papillomavirus, which causes genital warts, to be transmitted through oral sex.

(5) Chlamydia can infect the throat via oral sex, although this is thought to be uncommon. People with chlamydia may not have any symptoms and may not be aware they are infected.

(6) The hepatitis A virus is found in human feces, and may be passed on during anal-oral sex.

(7) Hepatitis B is contained in sexual fluids and blood and may be transmitted during oral sex in a similar way to HIV.

(8) Hepatitis C is generally only contained in blood, and will only be transmitted if there is blood present during oral sex.

(8) Gastrointestinal infections and parasites may be passed on during oral contact with the anus.

While homosexual relationship can be disastrous, heterosexual relationship (between man and wife) is certainly profitable for both. Here’s an excerpt from Dr. David E. Bratt’s “Nothing like Kissing,” posted on The Trinidad Guardian dated April 13, 2004.


Dr. Joseph M. Mercola ( of natural medicine fame says a healthy sex life can provide for a longer, healthier and, more enjoyable life. The top 11 health benefits of sex he mentioned are: (1) Improved immunity, (2) Heart health, (3) Lower blood pressure, (4) It's a form of exercise, (5) Pain relief, (6) May help reduce risk of prostate cancer, (7) Improve sleep, (8) Stress relief, (9) Boost the libido, (10) Improve bladder control in women, and (11) Increase intimacy and improve the relationship.

Among other things, pain relief is explained as the activity releasing pain-reducing hormones that help reduce or block back and leg pain, as well as pain from menstrual cramps, arthritis and headaches. On stress relief, sex is said to trigger release of its natural feel-good chemicals, thus easing stress and boost pleasure, calm and self-esteem. Sex and orgasms are also said to result in increased levels of the hormone oxytocin that helps one feel bonded to the partner, and better experience empathic connections.

Other than the reasons mentioned above, sexual relationship between a man and his wife under God's laws and directives is God's way of procreation.

GENESIS 1:27-28
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,

And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth.

Had all humanity followed this directive, there should not have been born on earth licentious people! All couples would be producing godly seed!

Let us make sure that the next generation of men will not be agnostics, atheists, hypersexual, libertines by heeding to God's counsel!

Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

How about God being racist?

Please follow our next issue. May God bless you.